Arthur Nagel vs Amaury Raynel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do second serve performances compare? Nagel has won 47.84% of points on their second serve in recent months, while Raynel has won 39.97%, suggesting an edge for Nagel in this area.
• Examining return game stats, Nagel has claimed 50.68% of points on opponents' second serves, narrowly surpassing Raynel, who has achieved 49.46%.
• For first serve returns, Raynel slightly leads with 31.68% in recent form compared to Nagel's 31.39%, indicating a marginal advantage for Raynel here.
• Under pressure, how do the players perform? Nagel has saved 48.45% of breakpoints, compared to Raynel’s 48.42%, suggesting a slight but nearly identical capacity to handle pressure situations.
• Looking at overall match win rates over the past year, Nagel has won 61.11% of matches, while Raynel has secured victory in 53.33% of their encounters, indicating a stronger overall performance from Nagel.
• What is their best surface? Nagel excels on clay with a 67% win rate, whereas Raynel's best surface is hard courts with a 62% success rate.
• In terms of competition level, Nagel has a win percentage of 61.54% in lower-tier tournaments over the last year, slightly outperforming Raynel's 55.17% in the same category.
• Head-to-head, how have they matched up? Nagel leads the series, having won their only prior encounter 6-1, 6-2 on clay.
• Faced with deciding sets, Nagel has a 57% success rate, higher than Raynel’s 45%, which could be crucial in predicting a long match's outcome.
• Notably, Nagel's opponent average rank has been tougher at 355.22 compared to Raynel’s 398.38, suggesting more rigorous competition faced by Nagel.
• Could break point conversion be an influential factor? Nagel converts 41.67% of their opportunities versus Raynel’s 37.1%, another potential edge for Nagel.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the upcoming match, Arthur Nagel showcases several advantages over Raynel. His stronger second serve performance and higher success rate in breaking opponents’ serves highlight his effective play style. This points ecosystem could sway the match in his favor, especially critical for decision sets where Nagel also demonstrates superior capability.

Nagel has achieved a more commendable win rate in recent matches, suggesting a consistent form. Despite Raynel's marginal lead in returning first serves, Nagel's broader competencies, particularly on clay courts where the match will take place, offer him significance.

Considering their previous encounter where Nagel defeated Raynel decisively, coupled with nuanced statistics such as an elevated breakpoint conversion rate, Nagel appears poised for victory. Thus, he stands as the likely winner in their forthcoming match.